Interpreting Crab Nebula's synchrotron spectrum: two acceleration mechanisms

Interpreting Crab Nebula's synchrotron spectrum: two acceleration mechanismsLyutikov, MaximTemim, TeaKomissarov, SergeySlane, PatrickSironi, LorenzoComisso, LucaDOI: info:10.1093/mnras/stz2023v. 4892403–2416
Lyutikov, Maxim, Temim, Tea, Komissarov, Sergey, Slane, Patrick, Sironi, Lorenzo, and Comisso, Luca. 2019. "Interpreting Crab Nebula's synchrotron spectrum: two acceleration mechanisms." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489:2403– 2416. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2023
ID: 154694
Type: article
Authors: Lyutikov, Maxim; Temim, Tea; Komissarov, Sergey; Slane, Patrick; Sironi, Lorenzo; Comisso, Luca
Abstract: We outline a model of the Crab pulsar wind nebula with two different populations of synchrotron emitting particles, arising from two different acceleration mechanisms: (i) Component-I due to Fermi-I acceleration at the equatorial portion of the termination shock, with particle spectral index pI ≈ 2.2 above the injection break corresponding to γwindσwind ̃ 105, peaking in the ultraviolet (UV, γwind ̃ 102 is the bulk Lorentz factor of the wind, σwind ̃ 103 is wind magnetization); and (ii) Component-II due to acceleration at reconnection layers in the bulk of the turbulent Nebula, with particle index pII ≈ 1.6. The model requires relatively slow but highly magnetized wind. For both components, the overall cooling break is in the infrared at ̃0.01 eV, so that the Component-I is in the fast cooling regime (cooling frequency below the peak frequency). In the optical band, Component-I produces emission with the cooling spectral index of αo ≈ 0.5, softening towards the edges due to radiative losses. Above the cooling break, in the optical, UV, and X-rays, Component-I mostly overwhelms Component-II. We hypothesize that acceleration at large-scale current sheets in the turbulent nebula (Component-II) extends to the synchrotron burn-off limit of ∊s ̃ 100 MeV. Thus in our model acceleration in turbulent reconnection (Component-II) can produce both hard radio spectra and occasional gamma-ray flares. This model may be applicable to a broader class of high-energy astrophysical objects, like active galactic nuclei and gamma-ray burst jets, where often radio electrons form a different population from the high-energy electrons.